In
order to examine the extent to which our schools provide a true education, one
must first examine what a “true education” entails. As nothing can be found or
explained in its “true” form, it is more convenient to examine a subjective
analysis of the term through the eyes of an adolescent.
Too much talking is done in our schools. The
conversation is one-sided, however. Students are (for the most part) taught to
remain silent and respectful from a young age. Repression does not respect any
party. Though an evolution is underway in the school system, attempting to “open
up” students, allowing greater freedom of expression and critical thinking, a
surfeit of conversation is in order. Students should be taken outside more
often, where learning would primarily be based off of observation and any
ensuing natural responses. This type of environment is devoid of the artificial
nature of the common classrooms of today.
Though a certain degree of learning
inevitably occurs within the confines of a classroom setting, students should
be granted mobility in their studies. This would not limit them to the assigned
homework assignments, and would instead allow them to undertake research
projects on topics of interest to them. This direct, hands-on approach to
learning allows for an inveterate absorption of knowledge. This mobility should not only be an
intellectual one. Students are granted limited physical mobility within
classrooms; they are not allowed to use the bathroom without permission, they
can not sit wherever they please, and they are not allowed to walk around. An
improvement in the aforementioned faulty grounds of education within our
schools may pave way for greater reform.
No comments:
Post a Comment